¹Ìµð¾î ºê¸®Çνº | ³»¼Àç´ã±â |
±â¼ú ¹ßÀüÀÌ °¡¼ÓȵǸé¼, ±Þ°ÝÇÑ °æÁ¦ Àüȯ ±¹¸éÀÇ ½Ã´ë°¡ ¿·È´Ù. ´åÄÄ ºØ±« ÀÌÈÄ ½ÃÀÛµÈ ÀÌ ¾ç»óÀº ¾ÕÀ¸·Î 20³â °£ ¼¼»óÀ» Çõ¸íÀûÀ¸·Î Å»¹Ù²ÞÇÒ °Í °°´Ù.
ÀÌ Çõ¸íÀû º¯È¸¦ À̲ô´Â °¡Àå Áß¿äÇÑ ±â¼úµé Áß ÁÖ¸ñÇØ¾ß ÇÒ 3°¡Áö°¡ ÀÖ´Ù. ¹Ù·Î À¯ÀüüÇÐGenomics, ¹ÙÀÌ¿À ¸®¿£Áö´Ï¾î¸µBioreengineering ±×¸®°í ÇÕ¼º »ý¸íSynthetic LifeÀÌ´Ù. ÀÌ ±â¼úµéÀº 60³â ÀÌ»óÀÇ °ú°ÅºÎÅÍ ºü¸£°Ô °¡¼ÓÈµÈ ¿¬±¸¿Í ÇнÀ °úÁ¤ÀÇ °á°ú´Ù.
¿ì¸®´Â 1950³â´ë À¯ÀüÀÚ ÄÚµåÀÇ ±âº»°ú ±âÃʸ¦ ÀÌÇØÇϱ⠽ÃÀÛÇß°í, 1970³â´ë¿¡ À̸£·¯ ÀÎÀ§ÀûÀ¸·Î DNA Á¶°¢À» Àаí À¯ÀüÀÚ¸¦ ¿¬°áÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. 1990³â´ë´Â 10¾ï ´Þ·¯°¡ ³Ñ´Â ºñ¿ëÀ» µé¿© Àηù ¿ª»ç ÃÖÃÊ·Î Àΰ£ °Ô³ðÀÇ ¹è¿ ¼ø¼¸¦ ¹àÈ÷´Â µ¥ ¼º°øÇß´Ù. ½ÅÀÇ ¿µ¿ªÀ» ¿³º¸±â ½ÃÀÛÇÑ °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ±×¸®°í 2000³â´ë¿¡ À̸£·¯ ¿ì¸®´Â ±× °úÁ¤À» ÀϹÝÀûÀÎ °ÍÀ¸·Î ġȯÇß°í, ºñ¿ëÀ» ±ØÀûÀ¸·Î ÁÙÀ̱⠽ÃÀÛÇß´Ù.
±×·¯³ª ÀÌ ±â¼úÀ» Ä¡·á¿¡ È°¿ëÇÏ´Â µ¥ ÀÖ¾î, °¡Àå Å« ¹®Á¦µé Áß Çϳª´Â À¯ÀüÀÚ ÆíÁý¿¡ ÀÖ¾î¼ÀÇ ³ôÀº ½ÇÆÐÀ²À̾ú´Ù.
ÀÌÈÄ ºÒ°ú 5³â Àü, Ķ¸®Æ÷´Ï¾Æ´ëÇб³ ¹öŬ¸® Ä·ÆÛ½ºÀÇ »ýÈÇÐÀÚ Á¦´ÏÆÛ ´Ù¿ìµå³ªJennifer Doudna¿Í ÇÁ¶û½º ¹Ì»ý¹°ÇÐÀÚ ¿¥¸Ï´º¿¤ »þÆæƼ¾îEmmanuelle Charpentier´Â ¡®Å©¸®½ºÆÛ Ä«½º³ªÀÎCRISPR Cas9¡¯¶ó´Â »õ·Î¿î ±â¼ú·Î »ý¹°Çа踦 ±ô¦ ³î¶ó°Ô ¸¸µé¾ú´Ù. ÀÌ ±â¼úÀº À¯ÀüÀÚ ÆíÁý ¿À·ù ¹®Á¦¸¦ º»ÁúÀûÀ¸·Î ÇØ°áÇÏ°í ¼ö¾øÀÌ ¸¹Àº »õ·Î¿î °¡´É¼ºÀ» ¿¾îÁá´Ù. Å©¸®½ºÆÛ Ä«½º³ªÀÎÀÌ ¡´»çÀ̾ð½ºScience¡µÁö¿¡ óÀ½ ¹ßÇ¥µÇÀÚ, Àηù°¡ ¿À·§µ¿¾È ±â´ëÇß´ø ¼ø°£À» ¸ÂÀÌÇß´Ù°í ´À²¼´Ù. Àΰ£ÀÌ »ç»ó ÃÖÃÊ·Î ½º½º·Î »ý¸í°øÇÐÀÚ°¡ µÉ ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´ø °ÍÀÌ´Ù.
Å©¸®½ºÆÛ Ä«½º³ªÀÎÀº ¸¶ÀÌÅ©·Î¼ÒÇÁÆ® ¿öµå ÇÁ·Î±×·¥ÀÇ ¡®°Ë»ö ¹× º¯°æ¡¯ ±â´Éó·³ °úÇÐÀÚµéÀÌ À¯ÀüÀÚÀÇ Æ¯Á¤ ¿µ¿ªÀ» ¸ñÇ¥·Î »ï¾Æ ±× ±â´ÉÀ» ã°í ġȯÇØÁÖ´Â °ÍÀ» °¡´ÉÇÏ°Ô ÇÏ´Â µµ±¸´Ù. Áï ¿øÇÏÁö ¾Ê´Â ¿µ¿ªÀ» Á¦°ÅÇÏ°í ±× ÀÚ¸®¿¡ ¿øÇÏ´Â ¿°±â¼¿sequenceÀ» ³Ö´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù.
»ó¾÷Àû ±Ç¸®¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °è¼ÓµÇ´Â ¹ýÀû ºÐÀï¿¡µµ ºÒ±¸ÇÏ°í, Å©¸®½ºÆÛ Ä«½º³ªÀÎÀº Àΰ£°ú ´Ù¸¥ »ý¹°Ã¼¿¡¼ À¯ÀüÀÚ¸¦ º¯ÇüÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÏ´Â »ç¶÷µé¿¡°Ô Á¡Á¡ ´õ Çʼö ¼±Åà µµ±¸°¡ µÇ°í ÀÖ´Ù. ¹«¾ùº¸´Ùµµ, ÀÌ°ÍÀº ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº ½ÇÇè¿¡ »ç¿ëµÇ¾ú´Ù.
- ¸»¶ó¸®¾Æ¿¡ ÀúÇ×¼º ÀÖ´Â ¸ð±â ¸¸µé±â
- Áúº´¿¡ ÀúÇ×¼º ÀÖµµ·Ï ½Ä¹°¿¡ À¯ÀüÀÚº¯Çü ½ÃÅ°±â
- À¯ÀüÀÚ Á¶ÀÛµÈ ¾Ö¿Ïµ¿¹° ȤÀº »ý¹°ÀÇ °¡´É¼º Ž±¸Çϱâ
- Ç÷¿ìº´°ú ¹éÇ÷º´À» Æ÷ÇÔÇÏ¿© ÀáÀçÀûÀ¸·Î Àΰ£ÀÇ Áúº´ Ä¡·áÇϱâ
±×·¯³ª Å©¸®½ºÆÛ Ä«½º³ªÀÎÀº ¾ÆÁ÷ Ãʱ⠴ܰ迡 ÀÖ´Ù. ¿©ÀüÈ÷ ÇØ°áÇØ¾ß ÇÒ ÀϹÝÀûÀÎ ¾ÈÀü ¹®Á¦´Â ÀǵµµÈ À§Ä¡¿¡¼ ¹þ¾î³ DNA ±¸¿ª¿¡¼ Á¾Á¾ ¹ß»ýÇÑ´Ù. Áï, ¡®¸ñÇ¥¸¦ ¹þ¾î³¡¯ ÆíÁýÀÇ °¡´É¼º¿¡ ÀÖ´Ù. °úÇÐÀÚµéÀº Å©¸®½ºÆÛ Ä«½º³ªÀÎÀ» ¹Ì¼¼ Á¶Á¤Çϸé ÀÌ ¹®Á¦¸¦ ÇØ°áÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù°í ¹ÏÁö¸¸, ½ÇÁ¦·Î ÀÌ·± ¹®Á¦°¡ »ç¶÷¿¡°Ô ÀÏ¾î³´Ù¸é ±×°ÍÀº ¾ÆÁÖ Ä¡¸íÀûÀÏ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù.
Å©¸®½ºÆÛ Ä«½º³ªÀÎÀ» ¹ß°ßÇÑ ´Ù¿ìµå³ª´Â ÀÌ µµ±¸ÀÇ ±àÁ¤Àû ÀáÀç·Â¿¡ ÀüÀ²Çϸ鼵µ ÀÌ°ÍÀÌ ¾Ç¿ëµÉ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù´Â Á¡µµ µ¿½Ã¿¡ ¿ì·ÁÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ µÎ·Á¿òÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇØ ´Ù¿ìµå³ª´Â ¿¬±¸ÀÚµéÀÌ ´Ù¾çÇÑ °¡´É¼º¿¡ ½ÉÃëÇÏ´õ¶óµµ ¼¼°è´Â ÀÌ µµ±¸ÀÇ ÀáÀçÀû ´ÜÁ¡À» È®½ÇÇÏ°Ô ÀÎÁöÇϵµ·Ï ÇÏ´Â µ¥ ³ë·ÂÀ» ±â¿ïÀÌ°í ÀÖ´Ù.
¿¹¸¦ µé¾î, ´Ù¿ìµå³ª´Â Å©¸®½ºÆÛ Ä«½º³ªÀÎÀÌ Àΰ£ÀÇ Á¤ÀÚ, ³ÀÚ, ¹è¾Æ¿¡¼ÀÇ ¼ÒÀ§ ¡®»ý½Ä ¼¼Æ÷¡¯¸¦ ÆíÁýÇÏ¿© ¡®¼³°èµÈ Àΰ£¡¯À» âÁ¶ÇÏ´Â µ¥ »ç¿ëµÉ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù°í µÎ·Á¿öÇÑ´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ º¯°æÀº žƿ¡°Ô ±×´ë·Î Àû¿ëµÇ¾î Èʳ¯ ž Èļյ鿡°Ôµµ Àü´ÞµÉ °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ÀÌ·Î ÀÎÇØ ¿¹ÃøÇÒ ¼ö ¾ø´Â °á°ú°¡ ÃÊ·¡µÉ ¼öµµ ÀÖ´Ù.
2015³â ´Ù¿ìµå³ª´Â ¿ö½ÌÅÏ D.C.¿¡¼ 20°³±¹ 500¸íÀÇ °úÇÐÀÚ, À±¸®ÇÐÀÚ ¹× ±âŸ °ü°èÀÚµéÀÌ Âü¼®ÇÑ Á¤»óȸÀǸ¦ ÁÖµµÇß´Ù. ÀÌ È¸ÀÇ´Â Å©¸®½ºÆÛ Ä«½º³ªÀο¡°Ô ²ûÂïÇÑ Áúº´À» ÆíÁýÇÏ´Â µ¥ »ç¿ëµÉ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ÇÑÁ¤µÈ °æ¿ì¿¡¸¸ - ±×¸®°í ´Ù¾çÇÑ À±¸®¿Í ¾ÈÀü ¹®Á¦°¡ ÇØ°áµÈ ÀÌÈÄ¿¡ - »ý½Ä ¼¼Æ÷ÀÇ ÆíÁýÀ» Çã¿ëÇÏÀÚ´Â Á¶Á÷À§¿øȸÀÇ ¼º¸í¼ ¹ßÇ¥·Î ¸¶¹«¸®µÇ¾ú´Ù.
´õ ÃÖ±Ù¿¡´Â ±¹¸³°úÇоÆÄ«µ¥¹ÌNational Academy of Sciences°¡ ¼ÒÁýÇÑ ±¹Á¦À§¿øȸ°¡ Àΰ£ »ý½Ä¼¼Æ÷ À¯ÀüÀÚ ÆíÁý¿¡ ´ëÇØ ¿ì·Á¿¡ ÁßÁ¡À» µÎ°í ÀÏ·ÃÀÇ ¾ÈÁ¤ÀåÄ¡¿Í °¨µ¶ÀýÂ÷¸¦ Á¦½ÃÇÏ´Â º¸°í¼¸¦ ¹ßÇ¥Çß´Ù. ÀÌ º¸°í¼´Â ¹è¾Æ ÆíÁý ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¹®À» ¿©´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³Î¸® ÀÎÁ¤µÇ¾ú´Ù.
¼±µµÀû ¿¬±¸ÀÚµé »çÀÌÀÇ ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ÀÏ¹Ý ÇÕÀǸ¦ ³Ñ¾î, Á¤Ã¥ ±â¹ÝÀÌµç °úÇÐÀû »çÀ¯µç ¡®ÆíÁýµÈ ¹è¾Æ¸¦ Àڱÿ¡ À̽ÄÇØ Åº»ýÇÏ°Ô Çϴ¡¯ µ¥ ÀÖ¾î ¼ö¸¹Àº ±âÁ¸ Á¦ÇÑ »çÇ×µéÀÌ À庮À» ÀÌ·ç°í ÀÖ´Ù. ¿¹¸¦ µé¾î, ¹Ì±¹ÀÇ ÀϺΠÁÖ¿¡¼´Â ÀÚ±Ý Á¶´Þ ¹æ½Ä¿¡ »ó°ü¾øÀÌ ¹è¾Æ ¿¬±¸ ÀÚü°¡ ¿øõÀûÀ¸·Î ±ÝÁö »çÇ×ÀÌ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ÆíÁýµÈ Àΰ£ ¹è¾ÆÀÇ À̽ÄÀº À½½Ä, Á¦¾à, ÈÀåÇ°°ú ¸¶Âù°¡Áö·Î ¹Ì ¿¬¹æ Àΰ£ ¿¬±¸ ±ÔÁ¤ ÇÏ¿¡, ±×¸®°í ÀáÀçÀûÀ¸·Î ÀÓ»ó ¿¬±¸ Å×½ºÆ®¿¡ °ü°èµÈ ¿¬¹æ¹ý¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ±ÔÁ¦µÉ °ÍÀÌ´Ù.
±ÔÁ¦ À庮 ¿Ü¿¡µµ ÇöÀç ÀÌ ±â¼úÀ» »ç¿ëÇÏ´Â °úÇÐÀÚµéÀÌ ¾ÆÀ̵éÀÇ À¯ÀüÀÚ¸¦ ¼³°èÇÏ´Â µ¥ ÇÊ¿äÇÑ °úÇÐ Áö½ÄÀ» ¾ò´Â µ¥ ¿À·£ ½Ã°£ÀÌ °É¸± °ÍÀÌ´Ù. Àΰ£ Àç¼³°è¿¡ ÀÖ¾î ¿ì¸®°¡ °ü½ÉÀ» °®°í Àִ Ư¼ºµé?Áö´É°ú °³¼º, ¿îµ¿ ´É·Â, ¿¹¼úÀû ´É·Â, À½¾ÇÀû ´É·Â°ú °°Àº?´ëºÎºÐÀº Çö´ëÀÇ ±â¼ú·Î ´Ù·ç±â¿¡´Â ³Ê¹«³ª º¹ÀâÇÑ °ÍµéÀÌ´Ù.
°Ô´Ù°¡ ¡®¹è¾Æ¿¡ À¯ÀüÀÚ Çϳª¸¦ ÆíÁýÇÏ´Â ´É·Â¡¯°ú ¡®À¯Àü Áúȯ°ú Áúº´ ´ëºÎºÐÀ» Ä¡·áÇϱâ À§ÇÑ ÆíÁý ´É·Â¡¯°£¿¡´Â ³Ê¹«³ª Å« °ÝÂ÷°¡ ¿©ÀüÈ÷ Á¸ÀçÇÑ´Ù.
ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ À庮ÀÌ ±Øº¹µÉ ¼ö ¾øÀ» °ÍÀ̶ó°í ¸»ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀº ¾Æ´Ï´Ù. ¾î´À ¹Ì·¡¿¡ ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ À庮Àº ±Øº¹µÉ °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ¿î ÁÁ°Ôµµ ±× ½Ã±â°¡ ¿À±â±îÁö, Áï Å©¸®½ºÆÛ Ä«½º³ªÀÎÀÇ È°¿ëÀÌ ÀÇ·á°èÀÇ ÁÖ·ù°¡ µÇ±â Àü¿¡ ÀÌ ¹®Á¦µé¿¡ ´ëÇØ »ý°¢Çغ¼ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ÃæºÐÇÑ ½Ã°£ÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù.
ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ±â¼úÀÇ ½ÃÀÛ°ú ¹æÇâ, ¹®Á¦¿Í À庮 µîÀ» °í·ÁÇßÀ» ¶§ ¿ì¸®´Â ÇâÈÄ ÀϾ ´ÙÀ½ 3°¡Áö¸¦ ¿¹ÃøÇغ»´Ù.
ù°, 2030³â±îÁö ¿ì¸®´Â Å©¸®½ºÆÛ Ä«½º³ªÀΰú °ü·Ã ±â¼úµéÀ» ¾ðÁ¦ ¾î¶»°Ô »ç¿ëÇØ¾ß ÇÏ´ÂÁö¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °áÁ¤À» °á±¹ ³»·Á¾ß ÇÒ °ÍÀÌ´Ù.
ÀÌ´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº Å« Áú¹®¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÇØ´äÀ» ã´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù.
- ¹è¾Æ¸¦ ÆíÁýÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â À¯Çü¿¡ Á¦ÇÑÀÌ ÀÖ¾î¾ß Çϴ°¡?
- ¸¸¾à ±×·¸´Ù¸é, ¿ì¸®°¡ ¼ö¹ÝÇØ¾ß ÇÒ °ÍÀº ¹«¾ùÀΰ¡?
- ½É°¢ÇÑ Áúº´ Ä¡·á¸¦ À§ÇÑ ¹è¾Æ ÆíÁý, ±× Á¢±ÙÀ» ¾î¶»°Ô ±ÔÁ¦ÇØ¾ß Çϴ°¡?
- ÀÌ ±â¼úÀ» »ç¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾î¾ß ÇÏ´Â »ç¶÷Àº ´©±¸Àΰ¡?
- Á¦ÇÑÀ» ¼³Á¤ÇÏ°í, ÀÌ ±â¼ú¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Á¢±ÙÀ» °ü¸®ÇÏ´Â »ç¶÷Àº ´©±¸Àΰ¡?
Àηù´Â »õ·Î¿î ¿¤¸®Æ® ½´ÆÛ Àΰ£ÀÇ Åº»ýÀÌ Áö´Ï´Â Àǹ̸¦ ÀÌÇØÇÏ°í ³íÀÇÇØ¾ß ÇÑ´Ù. ÀÌ´Â Àΰø Áö´É¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ¾ß±âµÉ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ±× ¾î¶² ÀáÀçÀû À§Çùº¸´Ù ÈξÀ ¹«¼¿î °ÍÀÌ´Ù.
µÑ°, Á¦ÇÑ°ú ±ÝÁö¸¦ ½ÃÇàÇÏ´Â ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤Àº ¹Ì·¡ÀÇ ºÎ¸ð¿Í ü¿Ü¼öÁ¤invitro fertilization, IVF Á¦°øÀÚµéÀÇ ¹Ý´ë¿Í ¸¶ÁÖÄ¡°Ô µÉ °ÍÀÌ´Ù.
¿À´Ã³¯ º¸Á¶»ý½Ä±â¼úassisted reproductive technology, ART(³ÀÚ¿Í Á¤ÀÚ¸¦ ü¿Ü¿¡¼ ¼öÁ¤½ÃÅ°´Â ü¿Ü¼öÁ¤ ±â¼ú µî ºÒÀÓÁõ Ä¡·á¸¦ ÃÑĪ)ÀÇ »ç¿ëÀº ¹Ì±¹¿¡¼ Å©°Ô ±ÔÁ¦µÇ°í ÀÖÁö ¾Ê´Ù. ¿©±â¿¡ ´õ Å« Á¦ÇÑÀ» °¡ÇÑ´Ù¸é, ÀÌÇØ ´ç»çÀÚµé °£ÀÇ ¹ýÀû ´ÙÅùÀÌ ¼ö¾øÀÌ ¹ß»ýÇÒ °ÍÀÌ´Ù.
¼Â°, °¡Àå Å« È¥¶õ°ú ¹®Á¦¸¦ ÀÏÀ¸Å³ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¿äÀÎÀº ³ôÀº ¼öÁØÀÇ ±ÔÁ¦¿Í °ü¸®°¡ ºÎÁ·ÇÑ ±¹°¡¿¡°Ô °úÇÐÀÚµéÀÌ ÀÌ ±â¼úÀ» ³²¿ëÇÏ´Â µ¥ ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀÌ´Ù.
±â¼ú º¸À¯±¹ÀÌ ´Ã¾î³ª¸é ¼ö¸¹Àº ±¹°¡¿¡¼ ÀÌ ±â¼úÀ» È°¿ëÇÑ´Ù. Ç¥¸éÀûÀ¸·Î ±¹Á¦ÀûÀÎ ±ÔÁ¦¸¦ °¡ÇÒ ¼öµµ ÀÖÁö¸¸ ½ÇÁúÀûÀÎ ±ÔÁ¦ÀÎÁö¿¡ ´ëÇؼ´Â ´©±¸µµ È®ÀÎÇÒ ¼ö ¾ø´Ù. ¹Ì±¹À̳ª µ¶ÀÏ µîÀÇ ¼±Áø ±¹°¡Á¶Â÷ ÀÚ±¹³» ±ÔÁ¦°¡ ¿Ïº®ÇÏ´Ù°í ¸»ÇÒ ¼öµµ ¾ø´Ù. °¢Á¾ ¿¬±¸ ±â°üµéÀÇ ¿¬±¸°¡ ¹Ù¶÷Á÷ÇÏÁö ¾Ê´Ù°í ÇÏ¿© ±ÔÁ¦¸¦ °¡ÇÏ´Â µ¥´Â ÇÑ°è°¡ Á¸ÀçÇÑ´Ù.
Áß±¹À̳ª ·¯½Ã¾Æ¿Í °°Àº µ¶Á¡ ±Ç·ÂÀÌ Áö¹èÇÏ´Â ±¹°¡ÀÇ °æ¿ì, ±¹Á¦Àû ±ÔÁ¦¿¡ Ãæ½ÇÇÑ ¿¬±¸¸¸ ÁøÇàµÈ´Ù°í ¹ÏÀ» ¼ö Àְڴ°¡. ÇÙ È®»ê ±ÝÁö µî°ú °°Àº °·ÂÇÑ ¼¼°èÀû ³ë·ÂÀÌ ÀÌ ±â¼úÀÇ ³²¿ë¿¡µµ Àû¿ëµÇ¾î¾ß ÇÒ ½Ã±â°¡ µµ·¡ÇÒ °ÍÀÌ´Ù.
* *
References List :
1. Science. Vol. 337, Issue 6096, pp. 816-821. Aug 17, 2012. Martin Jinek1,2,*, Krzysztof Chylinski3,4,*, Ines Fonfara4, Michael Hauer2,¢Ó, Jennifer A. Doudna1,2,5,6,¢Ô, Emmanuelle Charpentier4,¢Ô A Programmable Dual-RNA?Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity.
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/337/6096/816
2. Medium.com. David Ewing Duncan. Jun 1, 2016. It¡¯s Time to Believe in Synthetic Biology.
https://medium.com/neodotlife/q-a-enriquez-1c7d47c4a6ea
3. Nature Biotechnology. 07 December 2015. Andrew Hammond, Roberto Galizi, Kyros Kyrou, Alekos Simoni,Carla Siniscalchi, Dimitris Katsanos, Matthew Gribble, Dean Baker, Eric Marois, Steven Russell, Austin Burt, Nikolai Windbichler, Andrea Crisanti & Tony Nolan.
4. A CRISPR-Cas9 gene drive system targeting female reproduction in the malaria mosquito vector Anopheles gambiae.
http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v34/n1/full/nbt.3439.html?foxtrotcallback=true
5. Cell: Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids. February 08, 2017. Oliver Brabetz, Vijay Alla, Linus Angenendt, Christoph Schliemann,Wolfgang E. Berdel, Maria-Francisca Arteaga, & Jan- Henrik Mikesch. RNA-Guided CRISPR-Cas9 System-Mediated Engineering of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Mutations. Cell: Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids, Volume 6, p243?248.
http://www.cell.com/molecular-therapy-family/nucleic-acids/fulltext/S2162-2531(17)30001-X
CRISPR And the Looming Bio-Disruption
We¡¯ve now entered the second phase of the Fifth Techno-Economic Revolution, following the painful transition phase that began with the Dot-Com crash. The next 20 years will be a period of unprecedented rising affluence around the world.
As explained in our book, Ride the Wave, three of the most important technologies enabled by this revolution are Genomics, Bio-reengineering and Synthetic Life. These technologies are the result of a rapidly accelerating learning process over the past 60+ years. We began to understand the basic rudiments of the genetic code in the 1950s and by the 1970s, we were able to painstakingly read DNA segments and splice genes. In the 1990s, we succeeded in sequencing the first human genome at a cost of over $1 billion. In the 2000s, we made that process routine and began dramatically reducing the costs, However, one of the biggest problems with the therapeutic use of this technology remained the high error-rate involved in editing genes.
Then, just five short years ago, Jennifer Doudna, a biochemist at the University of California, Berkeley and French microbiologist, Emmanuelle Charpentier, startled the bio-world with a new technology called CRISPR-Cas9. That technology essentially solves gene editing-error problems and opens-up many new possibilities. Soon after it was first re- ported in the journal Science, CRISPR-Cas9 ushered in the long-anticipated moment when humans could, for the first time, bioengineer themselves.
________________________________________
CRISPR is a tool that enables scientists to target a specific area of a gene, working like the search-and- replace function in Microsoft Word, to remove an ¡°undesired¡± section and insert a ¡°desired¡± sequence.
Despite ongoing legal disputes over commercial rights, CRISPR has increasingly become the tool-of- choice for those seeking to modify genes in humans and other organisms. Among other things, it has been used in experiments to:
- make mosquitoes resistant to malaria,
- genetically modify plants to be resistant to disease,
- explore the possibility of engineered pets and livestock, and
- potentially treat human diseases including hemophilia and leukemia.
However, CRISPR is still in its infancy. General safe- ty issues which still need to be worked out include the possibility of ¡°off-tar- get¡± edits that occasionally occur in stretches of DNA outside the intended location. This could be devastating if it happened in a human, although scientists believe that fine-tuning CRISPR should eliminate this problem.
________________________________________
As the discoverer of the CRIS- PR technology, Doudna is both thrilled by its potential and apprehensive that CRISPR might be used for evil, that fear has motivated her efforts to make sure the world is aware of the potential downsides, even as researchers revel in its possibilities.
For instance, she fears that CRIS- PR will be used to edit the so- called ¡°germline cells¡± in human sperm, eggs, and embryos, thereby creating ¡°designer people.¡± These alterations would then be passed down to children and subsequent generations, with unpredictable consequences.
In 2015, Doudna helped spearhead a global summit, in Washington, D.C, attended by 500 scientists, ethicists, and others from 20 countries. It ended with the organizers issuing a statement that endorsed the eventual use of germline editing, but only in a very narrow set of cases where CRISPR could be used to edit out horrific diseases. And then, only after a host of ethical and safety issues are resolved.
More recently, an international committee convened by the National Academy of Sciences issued a report that highlighted concerns with human germline genetic engineering, but laid out a set of safeguards and oversight procedures. That report was widely regarded as opening the door to embryo-editing research.
________________________________________
Beyond this general consensus among leading researchers, there are a number of existing limits ? both policy-based and scientific ? which create barriers to implanting an edited embryo to achieve the birth of a child. For instance, there is a federal ban on funding gene editing research in embryos. In some states, there are also total bans on embryo research, regardless of how funded. In addition, the implantation of edited
human embryos would be regulated under federal human research regulations, as well as the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and potentially, the federal rules regarding clinical laboratory testing.
In addition to the regulatory barriers, scientists using the current technology are a long way from having the scientific knowledge necessary to design children. Most characteristics we might be interested in redesigning ? such as intelligence and personality, as well as athletic, artistic and musical ability are much too complex for today¡¯s techniques.
Furthermore, there is still a long way to go between the ability to edit one gene in an embryo and cures for most genetic diseases and disorders.
This is not to say that these barriers won¡¯t be over- come. But fortunately, we have a reasonable amount of time to consider the issues before the use of CRISPR becomes a mainstream medical practice.
Given this trend, we offer the following forecasts for your consideration.
First, by 2030 we will be forced decide when and how we should use CRISPR and related technologies.
That means answering big questions including:
Should there be limits on the types of things you can edit in an embryo?
If so, what should they entail?
How should we regulate access to embryo editing for serious diseases?
Who should be able to use this technology? And,
Who gets to set the limits and control access to the technology?
Mankind needs to debate and come to grips with the implications of creating a new line of elite super-humans. The implications are far scarier than any threat posed by artificial intelligence.
Second, the decision to put in place restrictions will raise objections from both potential parents and IVF providers.
Today, the use of assisted reproductive technologies is largely unregulated in the U.S. Imposing greater restrictions will certainly be challenged in the courts. And,
Third, the biggest source of disruption lies in the use of this technology by scientists operating in countries, that lack advanced regulatory controls.
Keep in mind that even though this technology was invented here, we cannot control what happens in other countries. Even in the United States, it can be difficult to craft guidelines that re- strict research society finds objectionable, while al- lowing other important research to continue. China is perhaps the most likely source of breakthroughs to undermine the OECD consensus.
References
1. Science. Vol. 337, Issue 6096, pp. 816-821. Aug 17, 2012. Martin Jinek1,2,*, Krzysztof Chylinski3,4,*, Ines Fonfara4, Michael Hauer2,¢Ó, Jennifer A. Doudna1,2,5,6,¢Ô, Emmanuelle Charpentier4,¢Ô A Programmable Dual-RNA?Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity.
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/337/6096/816
2. Medium.com. David Ewing Duncan. Jun 1, 2016. It¡¯s Time to Believe in Synthetic Biology.
https://medium.com/neodotlife/q-a-enriquez-1c7d47c4a6ea
3. Nature Biotechnology. 07 December 2015. Andrew Hammond, Roberto Galizi, Kyros Kyrou, Alekos Simoni,Carla Siniscalchi, Dimitris Katsanos, Matthew Gribble, Dean Baker, Eric Marois, Steven Russell, Austin Burt, Nikolai Windbichler, Andrea Crisanti & Tony Nolan.
4. A CRISPR-Cas9 gene drive system targeting female reproduction in the malaria mosquito vector Anopheles gambiae.
http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v34/n1/full/nbt.3439.html?foxtrotcallback=true
5. Cell: Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids. February 08, 2017. Oliver Brabetz, Vijay Alla, Linus Angenendt, Christoph Schliemann,Wolfgang E. Berdel, Maria-Francisca Arteaga, & Jan- Henrik Mikesch. RNA-Guided CRISPR-Cas9 System-Mediated Engineering of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Mutations. Cell: Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids, Volume 6, p243?248.
http://www.cell.com/molecular-therapy-family/nucleic-acids/fulltext/S2162-2531(17)30001-X